PROJECT FINDINGS & ACTION PLAN

It has been a very interesting journey to work on my research, to read about how to do it from a creative perspective, to collect all the information, to challenge the process and to conclude with findings and an action plan.

After determining the participation on my survey was not conclusive, Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). I put all my attention on the casual interviews as I mentioned on my previous post “Research Challenges”.

Once I finalised all the interviews, I color coded the key mentioned topics which were common across the participants. The color coding helped me to visually unify ideas and to easily transcribe them in a table where I highlighted key categories, concepts and possible solutions. It has been revealing to observe both perspectives, from academic staff and from the students. 

The key findings are:

  • The MA FDM course doesn’t have any formal traceability tool in terms of employability.
  • Students wonder about their future in the industry from an early stage as the course lasts 1 year. 
  • Networking is key for employability, the LCF provides multiple options, but students lack confidence to take advantage of the opportunity, which makes them feel uncertain about their future. 
  • Students would appreciate guidance as networking help them to feel included and helps them to move toward their professional goals. It would be valuable to provide support to define and action plan and a follow up accountability process.
  • Networking should be contextualised and seen as an opportunity for development, a learning experience where information is exchanged, no matter the ultimate outcome. 
  • Not all the students are ready to participate in some of the activities provided by the LCF. We could support them building confidence, however, this is a journey where they need to keep being curious.

Is it evident on the research that the networking opportunities are there, students are eager to participate, but they feel not confident and equality somethings they’re not ready to move forward. The proposal solution would be to provide a space were we complement the current Tutorial Framework with a Tutorial Framework for employability addressing the MA’s FDM concerns about their future employability and where the current networking opportunities are consciously explored according to the students needs and interests.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019) Research methods for business students. 8th edn. Harlow: Prentice Hall. (Pages 297 & 298)

RESEARCH METHODS & ETHICAL ENQUIRY FORM

Networking and its positive impact on future MA’s students’ employability and adaptation journey to the FBS, has been my research focus since we started the ARP, however it was not easy to summarise it in a tittle which I recently finalise it:

How Networking can positively impact future employability for the MA Fashion Design Management Students as well as their personal adaptation journey to the FBS

I believe this interest came from my years working in the industry and with the eagerness of detecting new young talent which could help any business evolving.

Furthermore, I wish many years ago I knew the importance of connecting with peers, colleagues, industry professionals, inspirational leaders… I’ve always done it instinctively but I would encourage everyone to be conscious and to have a methodology. The benefits are endless.

I am aware about students struggle to find a professional opportunity once they finish their MA’s, lots of competition, less job offers… they approach me asking for support and if I have any contacts. At the same time, I know the BFS/LCF offer different opportunities of interaction among the students and with the industry. However, I was not fully aware and I had to start my research. That translated in the need of learning about different research methods and evaluate which would be better for my ARP.

In terms of investigating the different networking opportunities, I had different options and among them: surveys, semi-structured interviews or simply casual conversations. I started from scratch as I was not aware of all the networking tools offered to the students, and this is why I decided to maintain casual chats with relevant staff members in order to shape the conversation depending on the inputs I obtain during the discussion. I believed to have some pre-defined questions would have limited the outcome as somehow, I would have been guided it. This decision was finally consciously taken after reflecting on it for weeks, after already having casual chats with the only goal of exploring and after our third ARP workshop.

Without knowing that this would be part of my research toolbox, I’ve started these casual chats in July and so far it has been an interesting journey which will help me to better define my survey to the Ma’s Fashion Design Management students, which I wanted to be quantitative to provide some data to my ARP.

The picture below shows the handwriting notes I tool during the casual conversations I’ve conducted so far.

I would like to highlight one of the key struggles has been to identify with who to maintain these casual conversations. For that, I hold few casual chats with peers and students, in order to understand who were those key stakeholders for my ARP.

Kara, Helen. (2015) Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences:  Practical Guide, Policy Press.